This and the previous photo were taken wth different settings (auto versus aperture priority, and resulting white balance change). Garry and I can’t agree on which we prefer. One thing is sure. It was the coolest outdoor place to be.
I don’t really notice much of a difference re aperture settings in this photo vs the previous one (I mean it’s not like one photo was shot at f3 and the other at f16). But the previous one is definitely much warmer…I like it better, as long as that is how it actually looked.
Don Fugler
July 23, 2016 11:30
I’m a big fan of “how it actually looked”. You can change the tones in processing but I like the original to resemble what I am seeing. In some shade situations, it takes me about five adjustments to “white balance” to find the right setting.
Dominique
July 23, 2016 13:13
I am with Sue. White balance on the previous shot seems more accurate. By looking at the shadows we can understand that the light should not be that blue.
I don’t really notice much of a difference re aperture settings in this photo vs the previous one (I mean it’s not like one photo was shot at f3 and the other at f16). But the previous one is definitely much warmer…I like it better, as long as that is how it actually looked.
I’m a big fan of “how it actually looked”. You can change the tones in processing but I like the original to resemble what I am seeing. In some shade situations, it takes me about five adjustments to “white balance” to find the right setting.
I am with Sue. White balance on the previous shot seems more accurate. By looking at the shadows we can understand that the light should not be that blue.